Click To Find Out
Click To Find Out
Donate!BOOKMARK our Homepage!
VOLUNTEERASIFACONTRIBUTEASIFAEXPLORE
LINK TO USASIFAJOIN ASIFAASIFAThanks!

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Theory: Our Dreams of the Future

Retro Future

THE FUTURE OF THE DISTANT PAST

Last week, I posted an article on James Montgomery Flagg's "Nervy Nat", a comic strip that ran in Judge magazine from 1903 to 1907. The page below was part of that post. It depicts a trip to Venus by zeppelin. For the past few days, I've been thinking about this comic and what it says about the way mankind's vision of the heavens has changed in the past century.

James Montgomery Flagg
In previous generations, outer space was thought of in terms of symbolic mythology. Mars was the god of war- Venus, the goddess of love. The stars in the sky formed the shapes of the signs of the Zodiac. The concept of traveling to another planet was unthinkable- as fantastic as the trip to the underworld, purgatory and paradise in Dante's Divine Comedy. When people of the past envisioned what the inhabitants of other planets might be like, they conceived of gods and spirits who lived lives like those of the heroes and villains found in fables and ancient myths.

In Disney's 1957 television program, "Mars And Beyond", director Ward Kimball explored this concept...

Retro Future
People On Other Planets
"Mars & Beyond" (Disney/1957)
(Quicktime 7 / 13.3 MB)

PLEASE NOTE The text and media files on the ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive Blog are not to be duplicated, redistributed or hosted on other websites without the prior written permission of the Board of Directors of ASIFA-Hollywood.

Retro Future
Around the turn of the 20th century, mankind's conception of the world underwent a huge shift. Advances in technology were occurring at an unprecedented rate. These changes affected the way people lived their lives and the way they thought about their place in the universe. Technology was enabling people to travel faster, further and more comfortably than ever before. For the first time, ordinary folks were able to travel all around the globe. People began to think there might be no limit to the number of amazing changes technology was going to bring to them in the next hundred years.

They were right.

50s Future
By the midpoint of the 20th century, things that had seemed unthinkable a generation before had become commonplace... trains, planes and automobiles carried people to every point on earth. Electricity powered a wide range of household appliances. Television, phonographs and radio enabled pictures and sound to be captured and broadcast to every household in America. The lives led by the average family in the year 1950 would have seemed like wild, futuristic dreams to the generations that preceded them.

But society wasn't through dreaming.

CHESLEY BONESTELL'S TRIP TO VENUS

Chesley Bonestell
Chesley Bonestell was trained as an architect. He designed the art deco facade and gargoyles for the Chrysler Building in New York, and was the first to create an architectural rendering of what the Golden Gate Bridge would look like spanning the opening of San Francisco Bay. In the late 30s, he created matte paintings for movies like Citizen Kane and The Hunchback of Notre Dame. But an interest in astronomy soon led him to his most well known work: illustrations depicting space travel.

Chesley Bonestell
In 1944, Bonestell created photorealistic paintings of Saturn for Life magazine that caused a sensation. This led to a series of illustrated articles which were eventually collected in an anthology titled, The Conquest of Space. Bonestell worked with George Pal as a designer on Destination Moon and War of the Worlds. When the famous scientist, Wernher Von Braun was preparing a series of articles for Colliers on the topic of manned space exploration, Bonestell was his first pick to illustrate. Von Braun had dedicated himself to informing the American public that space travel was not just a dream- it could become a reality- all that was needed was money and will. Remember those two things... I'll be coming back to them in a moment.

Chesley Bonestell
Here is an article from the March, 1950 issue of Coronet magazine. Illustrated by the "father of modern space art", Chesley Bonestell, this fantastic vision of a vacation trip to Venus in the year 2500 doesn't just offer suggestions for what sort of technology might exist; it shows how that technology might be incorporated into our everyday lives.

Retro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future
Retro FutureRetro Future

ANIMATION EXPLORES DISTANT WORLDS

Man in Space
Director/animator Ward Kimball (far right) saw Bonestell's illustrations in Colliers and encouraged Walt Disney to produce a television program based on Wernher von Braun's vision of the future. Disney, Kimball and von Braun came together to create three episodes of the Disneyland television series- "Man in Space", "Man and the Moon" and "Mars and Beyond".

In this segment from "Mars and Beyond" the Disney animators speculate on the strange forms alien life might take...

Retro Future
Life Forms On Other Planets
"Mars & Beyond" (Disney/1957)
(Quicktime 7 / 11 MB)

PLEASE NOTE The text and media files on the ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive Blog are not to be duplicated, redistributed or hosted on other websites without the prior written permission of the Board of Directors of ASIFA-Hollywood.

It's impossible to overstate how important the Disney space shows were to the American space program. President Dwight Eisenhower requested a copy of "Man in Space" to screen for his top military officers to convince them that space travel was indeed possible. Six months after "Mars and Beyond" aired, congress passed the National Aeronautics and Space Act which established NASA. The launch of Russia's Sputnik satellite in October 1957 might have been the immediate impetus for the swift passage of the funding for the program, but the groundwork for the concept behind NASA was laid by Wernher von Braun and Walt Disney.

THE MEN WHO TOOK US TO THE MOON

Retro Future
Walt Disney and Wernher von Braun

Clearly, scientists like Wernher von Braun and politicians like Eisenhower and Kennedy were responsible for America's space program. But it took more than science and funding to put man on the moon. It took will. The awe inspiring imaginary vistas of Chesley Bonestell and the fantastic animation of Ward Kimball and Walt Disney became our collective dreams. The day after "Man in Space" aired, every man, woman and child in America had the same fantasy in their head- the burning desire to go to the moon. The visions created by these artists and filmmakers became reality because they crystallized and energized our collective will.

Animation has the power to mobilize society to do great things.

THE FUTURE OF THE PRESENT

If you've read through this half century of history I've laid out for you, I'm going to reward you by poking pins in a few of your childhood sacred cows- the futuristic visions of the latter part of the 20th century.

Retro Future
"So Bad It's Good?"

I've read several places on the internet about the concept of retro futurism. This is one of those post-modern, ironic ideologies that looks back at the visions of the future from the past as some sort of quaint, naiive thing. The problem with this outlook is that it ignores the fact that the fantasies it mocks were responsible for putting man in space.

Retro Future
"Obsolete Future?"

If the visions of Von Braun, Disney and Bonestell are now considered "camp", what sort of imagery have we replaced it with?

Our modern conception of futuristic fantasy has been dragged down to banal reality by people with nowhere near the imagination of the futurists of the past. If movies represent our collective dreams, then let's look at what we are dreaming about...

Retro Future
"Today's Future?"

Instead of idealistic heroes like Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon, space is populated by jaded, long-haul truckers like Han Solo and the squabbling crew of the Nostromo in Alien. Stanley Kubrik succeeded in turning a space station into a boring 21st century DMV waiting room in 2001. The world of the future isn't a beautiful city of glass and steel where people live in climate controlled safety- in Blade Runner it's a crowded downtown ethnic marketplace with weather that would make Seattle seem like a tropical paradise.

Retro Future
"Has our imagination gone soft?"

Retro FutureRetro FutureSpace ships are no longer sleek, chrome plated rockets with exotic tail fins- they're flying shoeboxes with a bunch of dirty breakfast cereal glued all over them. Robots aren't complex humanoid machines whose prime directive is assisting their owners in any way they can- they're trash cans on wheels that make annoying beeps and blorps, or time-traveling thugs in leather jackets riding motorcycles.

Aliens aren't fantastic creatures made of crystal that chew the landscape into wild filagrees like in "Mars and Beyond", or even super-intelligent beings who will help us solve all the world's problems with their advanced technology. They're medieval monsters with scales like a dragon that lurk in the shadows, or parasitic worms that crawl inside us to devour us from the inside out, or rubbery magical midgets covered with wrinkles and warts. Science has been replaced by pseudo-religious concepts like "the force". Aliens in Close Encounters don't just have the technology to make Richard Dreyfuss mold mountains out of his mashed potatoes, they can even make toys come to life!

Cynicism and magic are the order of the day- no room for scientific inquiry and ambition...

Retro Future
"Is this what life on other planets looks like?"

If these are our collective visions of the future, I sincerely hope that our dreams never come true. Perhaps we should consider dreaming a higher quality of dream. Let's bring back the futurism we were cheated out of and start building a future that's worth inhabiting.

Stephen Worth
Director
ASIFA-Hollywood
Animation Archive
.

Labels: , , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

20 Comments:

At 7:20 PM, Blogger Justin said...

Amazing post Stephen! Nice to know others ruminate on these matters in the animation world. Hope you do more of this. Cheers

 
At 8:59 PM, Anonymous babstoyfish said...

One thing's for sure. The future now contains a lot of advertisement. Brand names everywhere, on everything. We've been watching the decline of our culture for so long into total commercialism, it's no surprise the future is looking more dystopic, just based on our observation of the direction we're taking ourselves in.

The way I look at it is that art in general has tended more toward cultural criticism and away from idealistic vision. Which isn't a bad thing necessarily, although I agree that science fiction could probably stand to be a lot more scientific.

 
At 1:34 AM, Anonymous Gordon Stark said...

Chesley Bonestell is the greatest
space artist. Before Hubble, there
was Chesley. His work is matched
only by Syd Mead, but it is Chesley
who gave us our first photo quality
inspirations of what our solar
system looks like in a way that
Hubble would never be able to match.

It is so good to see these important people receiving the recognition they deserve for lifting us above our petty terrestrial concerns, that we might open our eyes to the greater realities of our galactic neighborhood.

 
At 5:28 AM, OpenID skywookiee said...

http://www.davidszondy.com/future/futurepast.htm gives me a feeling the person behind that site is ashamed of having a geeky hobby and that's the reason why he mocks all those ideas. Of course a lot of them are not practical but it's easy to pick them apart in hindsight. I also feel the trend of mocking the past comes from the fear of being mocked ourselves in the future.

 
At 5:41 AM, Blogger Johnny E said...

This was a brilliant post until the unnecessary soapboxing at the end... yes, we have different conceptions about alien life and the future nowadays, but they're no *worse* than the 50's ones. They had overly optimistic camp, we have overly pessimistic grit - it's just a pop culture fashion. Implying movies like Alien, Star Wars, and 2001 lacked "imagination" is ridiculous. 2001! Say what you like about it, I'm hardly a fan, but its not exactly unambitious.

 
At 6:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great Post! Lets hope we can bring more optimism back into our dreams of the future. I am a believer in intention forming your reality and our society's collective vision of the future filled with war, over crowding and opportunist heroes paints a bleak picture. I hope things might change. Thanks!

 
At 8:04 AM, Blogger James Hay said...

Mr. Worth, misses the point in his criticism of retro futurism. He didn't read closely enough in the wikipedia article that he himself links to. (Or was this link added later?) While there is sometimes an ironic element, retro futurism, and its Victorian equivalent Steampunk, more often embrace these old visions of the future.

 
At 9:50 AM, Blogger Stephen Worth said...

Retro-Futurism and Steampunk are essentially styles of decoration that create a fetish for the surface elements of classic futuristic fantasy without including the context. My point was that fantastic dreams can change the world. I don't think slapping some brass gauges or fancy tailfin on a computer case is ever going to do that.

Futurism used to be focused on technology in service to mankind- making the world a more beautiful and exciting place to live- the pursuit of progress. But then just about all aspects of culture- music, illustration, the arts- used to be about that too. No more.

 
At 10:43 AM, Blogger Josh "Just What the Doctor Ordered" Heisie said...

This might be my favorite post yet!
I remember hearing these theories in person at the Coral when Dave and I were foolish enough to ask if you liked Star Wars.

You forgot one thing about our modern vision of the future: if it isn't grubby and Blade-Runnerish, it will be a white, smooth and streamlined like Mac computers and that girl robot from Wall-E. In other words, incredibly boring.

Thanks for this wonderful post, Mr. Worth!

Josh Heisie

 
At 2:20 PM, Blogger DavidHRosen said...

Terrific, fantastic and brilliant article, Stephen, but I must disagree with you on one point: It's not that forward-looking artists are boring and unimaginative, it's that their visions are a reflection of our common mood today.

In the 1700s, when hot air balloons and canals were first being built, people thought that the increased communication and trade would eliminate war. This was the transition point when utopias went from being distant lands or creations of new political order to being driven by technology.

This thinking survived the breakout of WWI, when people thought that the advanced technology would make it the shortest war yet and so save lives. By the war's end, we saw the rise of dystopian fiction, frequently blaming technology for destruction and dehumanization.

The utopia/dystopia cycle has oscillated since then, especially after Hiroshima when the atom was seen as humanity's savior or ticket to extinction.

So it's not that we've forgotten how to create beautiful pictures of the future, but that we get excited/bummed about the present from time to time...lately, more bummed.

Again, I applaud your fantastic article! Thanks for it!

David Rosen
blog: SellingTomorrows.com

 
At 12:06 AM, Blogger Amir Avni said...

You raise excellent points Steve,
I never understood it when people call big dreamers "naive",
How does being cynical make them better than the dreamers they shun down?

I'm very interested in the role science plays to advance society,and I definitely agree that animation and other forms of art can bring it into the public imagination, and as a result, make the dreams come true.

babstoyfish- Well said!

 
At 1:52 PM, Blogger AStanhope said...

The clips from Mars and Beyond were fantastic. What a treat! Thanks!

 
At 8:24 AM, Anonymous Izek Inge said...

I actually miss the dark, gritty and pessimistic s-f from the '70s and '80s like Outland, Silent Running, Dark Star, Enemy Mine or Saturn 3. My whole childhood was built from those dystopian blocks. Most sci-fi movies nowadays are nothing but flashy effects and explosions. And exploding robots. Also flashing.

 
At 9:12 AM, Anonymous Adrienne Jenkins said...

You make some excellent points to think about, Mr. Worth.

On the one hand, your thoughts about the mindset of the public about science, technology, space exploration, and the future in general is really exiting in the prospect of figuring out how to regain that spirit that we as a society seems to have lost!

On the other hand, looking back historically at the denial of reality of much pop culture of the 1950's makes one wonder if it was all in all a *better* time per se, or simply a more happily ignorant one.

It was certainly easier then to get people's attention, and galvanize them behind an idea.

It's the year 2009, and by all accounts, it should be the "future" already. That many people see the future as being dystopian or boring can hardly be blamed on a lack of imagination.

Yet, the attitudinal, sneering, cynical attitude of many people (most alarmingly, people way too young to be so jaded) is probably doing it's part to make the future we fear a self-fufilling prophecy. Anything earnest and posative in entertainment is seen as being "gay" or nieve, or lame or whatever.

Corporately, I think people are just dissapointed with the failures of the past, and the daunting realities of the present. Humans are at kind of weird, inconsistant point. We have the internet, cell phones, HD camcorders, etc., yet most of the world lives in crushing poverty, and will continue to for a long time. Space exploration seems now to be an extravagant, and irresponsible hobby--er, with not much return on the investment!

Hmm. It would be something to see popular entertainment that was relevant and encouraging to this...rather stark and discouraging present.

--Adrienne Jenkins

 
At 9:34 AM, Blogger Niki said...

This indeed an amazing post, but I must repremand you on some of your comments! Star Wars and Star Trek are as amazing as Buck Rogers and the Vorkosigan Saga. It's just that people shouldn't let this define thier view of the future. None of these should, but it is best that we study them so we better present our own views! I honestly would love to see a new finely crafted version of the future were we would live in a sort of combination of the two

 
At 5:18 PM, Blogger Cameron said...

I suppose there has to be one way to do everything. For the record, 2001, Star Wars, and Close Encounters are great movies. I never saw 2001 or Close Encounters in my childhood either, which hardly makes them "sacred cows" in my eyes (I hate that term). What of great philosophical and religious epics like 2001, Solaris, and Stalker?

What's wrong with using science-fiction to make a statement about something else? Who would want to make nothing but movies about how great the future is going to be? Maybe there's room for that, but shouldn't we have access to social criticism and fantastical twists? I don't see why all science-fiction has to always celebrate "the glory of human science." Those movies have been made already. Science is fantastic, but narrative variety is better.

 
At 9:21 AM, Blogger Aaron White said...

The optimism, not to say triumphalism, of early SF ("Humanity Uber Alles!"- E. E. "Doc" Smith) paved the way for space exploration, but also for the atomic bomb, wholesale ecological and cultural destruction, Neo-Cons... pretty much everything wrong with our planet today issues from humans trying to impose their will on the world. And that old SF is the Gospel of humans imposing their will on The Other.

The gloomy aspects of 2001, Blade Runner, Neuromancer and such are simply the result of SF diagnosing the real results of the ideas that fueled early SF. SF is as useful for diagnosing the present as it is for shaping our dreams of tomorrow, and I'd rather have SF with the honesty of Philip Dick than SF with the tribal triumphalism of "Doc" Smith.

Aesthetically, though, there's something to be said for old pulp SF. I'd be much much happier about humans stomping all over the moon if they were dressed like Ming the Merciless.

 
At 5:29 PM, Blogger Rick Roberts said...

I always found the Ridley Scott's Blade Runner interpretation of the future to be tragically realistic. I am not talking about the look per se but the coldness and isolation of humanity as well as the social decline. I look at that 50's interpretation as the appealing, fantastic vision with society advancing.

 
At 5:48 PM, Blogger Rick Roberts said...

Strictly speaking in terms of the asethetic superiority, the poorest and un-imaginitive visions of the future are the convenient ones. When you focus on convenience and plausibility, you limit your imagination to what is in front of you. That is the problem I have with the visions of the future in the 70's onward, they don't really stretch the realms of what you can do with imagination. Sure you have robots, hovercars, gigantic space crafts that can be support multiple humans, awesome things. But where is the bizarre like in those old 50's sci-fi serials ?

 
At 9:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I lived through that era.. I was watching TV as far back as I can remember.. about 1949 - 50. I watched Chicago TV, saw 'Buck Rogers' and all the info you have here.. I saw or read about. I have looked & looked for a forum about our lost, modern world. I remember the 'Case study' houses.. the passenger jets of more than half a century ago.. they flew FASTER than today's. 600 or even 615 mph cruising speed (4-jet) 707's..

Our very bright & modern future.. has been deleted. Greed. The world of gauche ticky-tacky junk is much.. much more profitable.

More than 40 years ago a Saturn V took a little jaunt out to our little sister world.. something we have long lost the ability to do. It was trashed by Nixon & his merry syndicate of Repub'$

I can't write more for now. I may be back..

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home