Click To Find Out
Click To Find Out
Donate!BOOKMARK our Homepage!
VOLUNTEERASIFACONTRIBUTEASIFAEXPLORE
LINK TO USASIFAJOIN ASIFAASIFAThanks!

Thursday, June 19, 2008

The State of Cartooning: Newspaper Comics

This post is just the tip of the iceberg... see reason number 2 on our The Top Ten Reasons To Support The A-HAA for links to more great posts about print cartoonists.

David Apatoff's Comic Collection
David Apatoff's collection of newspaper comics got me to thinking about the sorry state of cartooning today. I don't think most people realize just how far the market for cartoons has fallen over the past few decades. Newspaper comics are the clearest example of how quickly a once vital artform can go the way of the dodo bird. This weekend, take a close look at your local Sunday funnies. Compare them to these comics from nearly 70 years ago. Keep in mind that this is just an average Sunday from an average newspaper of the time period. I think you'll be shocked at how different it is from what passes for comics in today's papers.

David Apatoff's Comic Collection
Until I had a chance to look through David Apatoff's collection and actually see a complete Sunday comics section, I had no idea how huge and diverse the Sunday comics section was in the past. Not all these comics are classics, but even the worst of them are more interesting than the crop in current papers. It's a crime how lousy newspaper comics have become.

David Apatoff's Comic Collection
Here are some statistics to think about, courtesy of Mike Fontanelli's research... At the time this newspaper comic section was published, Li'l Abner had a circulation of over 80 million, and Capp made $200,000 a year from the strip- not counting licensing and other ancillary income. At that time, the population of the United States was 145 million, and adjusting for inflation, Capp's salary in 2008 dollars would be 2.2 million dollars a year. Capp's cartoon was read every day by more than half of the United States, and he made much more money any modern day print cartoonist makes from his work. But Capp wasn't alone. Chic Young made $5,000 a week from Blondie. Milton Caniff, Chester Gould, George MacManus, Hal Foster... all of these men made MUCH more than the typical cartoonist today does, and their work was seen and enjoyed on a single day by more people than current artists can hope for in a decade. The difference in scale is mind boggling.

David Apatoff's Comic Collection
This week, I had the opportunity to spend an afternoon chatting with Ralph Bakshi. I can't seem to shake one comment he made when he visited the archive and saw what we were doing here. Ralph said, "Cartooning is in jeopardy." He explained that artists who would have become cartoonists in the past are going into other fields, because the market for cartooning has deteriorated so much. In the past, a cartoonist could do a newspaper strip, or contribute one panel gags to magazines, or do spot illustrations for advertisements, create comic books or make animated cartoons. Today, every single one of those branches of cartooning is struggling for survival. There are animated cartoons today that are neither animated, nor cartoons. The comic book business is suffocating under the weight of an unsupportable business model. Magazines rarely run cartoons, and advertisements are usually just Photoshopped collages. Some markets, like newspaper comics may not survive at all. It's clear that if you're determined to become a cartoonist today, you can expect to be swimming against the current.

David Apatoff's Comic Collection
It's difficult not to be depressed. I'm not sure what can be done to reverse the trend. I can only hope that this website will act as a catalyst to inspire the artists who truly love the medium to create something totally new and exciting. We can only hope that artists will stick with the art of cartooning and build up a totally new market on the internet, because that's our best hope for the resurgence of cartooning. Perhaps today's hard work and sacrifices will spawn a market for cartoons that replaces and surpasses all the old models. I sure hope that happens, and I'm doing what I can to see that it does.

David Apatoff's Comic Collection
I hope you cartoonists out there understand what I'm saying... I'm not saying that there are no good cartoonists and no good cartoons today. I'm saying that the market for cartooning has been allowed to dwindle down to nothing. That isn't good for the business of cartooning or for cartoonists who want to make a living drawing. I'm reminding you here that there was a time when cartoonists didn't think small or settle for being boxed into a "niche market". To them, becoming successful was the goal, and they didn't consider that to be the same as "selling out". The aimed straight for the mainstream with a variety of challenging, well drawn comics, and they hit it big. Let's find a way to do that again.

The New Orleans Times Picayune
First Comic Section
Sunday, June 25th, 1939

1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics

Second Comic Section

1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics

Third Comic Section

1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
1939 Sunday Color Comics1939 Sunday Color Comics
For more great newspaper cartoons, see... Milt Gross Sunday Pages and Dailies Part One, Part Two, Part Three, Part Four, Part Five, Part Six and Part Seven; Chic Young's Blondie, Rube Goldberg's Side Show; George Lichty's Grin and Bear It, Cliff Sterrett's Polly & Her Pals Part One, Part Two and Part Three; and Harrison Cady's Birds' Eye Views

Stephen Worth
Director
ASIFA-Hollywood
Animation Archive
.

Labels: , , , ,

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

15 Comments:

At 8:05 PM, Blogger Weirdo said...

What do you mean by "unsupportable business model" for comic books? Great post.

 
At 9:50 PM, Blogger Stephen Worth said...

Comic books are all distributed from a single source directly to mom and pop stores with very little retail marketing experience. Large bookstores and other chain outlets that normally carry magazines won't carry comics; and even if they wanted to, comics aren't distributed through their normal supply channels. This means there is no competition on the wholesale level, and no professional marketing on the retail level.

Because print runs are based on advance orders, and most ground level retailers are afraid to stock non-mainstream titles, independent comics are hard pressed to get print runs higher than a few thousand. This has led to a market where "safe" established titles get all the exposure, while innovative titles only get produced through the sweat and determination of the artists who make them.

In the past, there were dozens of titles in lots of different genres selling hundreds of thousands of copies on newsstands and in dime stores all over the country. Today, there is so little money in comics, that has boiled down to a few big comic lines with established characters in one genre- superheros. The business structure of comics has made innovation impossible, and variety unprofitable.

The artists who are innovating in comics are doing so at the expense of their own financial well being. They're the ones with the passion for the medium that doesn't allow them to do anything else. There are equivalents in many other types of cartooning as well.

 
At 6:29 AM, Anonymous Nicolas Martinez said...

Hey Steve, I was wondering if you've heard of Dumm Comics.

www.dummcomics.com

They may not be the printed on newpapers or anything, but at least it keeps the creativity and individuality of comics alive. I read them everyday.

 
At 9:19 AM, Blogger Weirdo said...

Oh, that's what it was. Yeah, I definitely agree with that statement. When they have comics in bookstores or chain stores, there are three basic genres or titles: superheroes, Star Wars, and Archie Comics. I'm thinking maybe comic book artists should switch from regular comics to comic book novels.

 
At 10:46 AM, Blogger Beto said...

Steve, the way I see it, things look far more positive for the outlook of comics than ever before. What we are witnessing is a total transformation of the playing field, where the old ways are giving way fast to new ways of doing things. The Internet itself has a lot to do with that.

For the digital generation (anyone born after 1980) reading news on the newspaper is already an anachronism. They go online for that. I seriously doubt the newspaper business as we know it will make it past the aging Baby Boomer generation. So yeah, everything is going online - including comics. And comics we can find in there by the bagful, of all varying kinds of quality and interest.

Regarding the flaky business model of comics, even that is poised to change. It used to be that, if you wanted to self-publish a comic, you had to lose your shirt on an advance print run of a few thousand copies that, more likely than not, would never sell out completely. Print-on-demand services on the web, such as Lulu and MagCloud are changing that - for the better. And while it doesn't take the hardship of making a living on comics these days out of the equation, it certainly is one less thing to worry about. We may miss the thrills of the proverbial aisle browsing of hard copies at a real comic store, but giving artists the ability to reach their audience directly is probably worth the trade-offs.

The best comics do cater to a small, niche market anyway- the hard work now is how to make that niche find you as an artist, which is what the Web excels at.

The most successful cartoonists of the future will be those who realize how things are changing and are able to use these changes to their best advantage.

 
At 11:57 AM, Blogger Mad Taylor said...

Hey Steve!

Well that is a sad and scary observation Ralph made. But I think it came with a dose of neglect. I think comics are alive, just not in newspaper form. I find myself not turning to the newspaper, such as the LA Times, for my comics at all. Modern newspaper stuff just presents this boring sort of tone for me. Plus they re-print Peanuts (which is a great strip) but come on pass the torch! I blame the dopes at the syndicates. I'm sure there are tons of new young talents that get well done strips rejected. There are way better comics in FREE! alternative press publications. When I was going to school in Chicago a publication called The Chicago Reader had way better comics in it! For FREE! I used to clip all the Chris Wares and hang them on my wall. They were full page just like the classics you have up!

I think there are some amazing collections of the old strips being put together. The Popeye, Peanuts, Dennis the Menace, Dick Tracy,and Pogo collections just to name a few. I am in my twenties and have found those to be very appealing and a great way to be inspired by the classics. Screw the Peanuts newspaper re-prints, I collect those books and read it from the start!

In terms of newer things have you ever seen Perry Bible Fellowship? That strip is amazing and presents all sorts of new humor. I believe it started on the web and has been very well received. Dark Horse put out a collection in book form which sold well. I discovered it in The Chicago Reader.

Don't worry Steve n' Ralph comics are still doing pretty good. There is a great one I've been following on-line called Radbod done by Barnaby Richards. I have found it to be pretty inspiring in a number of ways. One being that it's updated each week and you can "click on the sequence to watch the story unfold from the start."

To me this isn't a sad time at all. Ziggy can now take up a whole two pages in a stupid newspaper!* I don't care. I'm finding better stuff in many other places.

*My grandma always used to bitch about how much room Ziggy got in our local paper, practically a whole half page!

 
At 3:36 PM, Blogger The Jerk said...

when sunday comic strips were entire pages, how large where the originals drawn, generally?

 
At 2:18 AM, Blogger ted said...

Boy Howdy! It's a changin wind thats blowin through CartoonLand! I b'lieve the way of the future is more graphic novels, more indy comics and more varieties of comic stories. All we have to do is support our local book sellers, and let them know what we want.
The bigger companies, like Chapters, Coles, etc need blockbuster titles that are guaranteed to sell a bajillion titles because they have all their eggs in one basket. If we support the industry from a grassroots level, hopefully we can encourage a more healthy and diverse range of ideas.

 
At 1:55 AM, Blogger Eddie Fitzgerald said...

A good but sad post. Internet comics may be the answer in the future but they're not there yet. People want everything they get on the net for free, and advertizers haven't put serious money into internet comics yet.

I think it's important to get well-done kids comics out there. Hook 'em while they're young!

 
At 12:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's only one problem with the comparisons to Chic Young and Al Capp: They were both the superstars of their day. Charles Schulz did much better, financially, than they did. If you're comparing their incomes to the "typical" cartoonist today, then you're forced to compare the incomes of popular-but-not-universal cartoonists such as Stephan Pastis, Mark Tatulli, Jef Mallett, Richard Thompson, et al to the lesser-known strips of long ago--the ones where you look at that paper today and say "what was that?" Or compare Capp and Young to Garry Trudeau, Lynn Johnston, or Cathy Guisewite.

 
At 1:57 PM, Blogger Stephen Worth said...

Capp and Young are good comparisons for Trudeau and Guisewite. (At least when it comes to my point about the market for cartooning...) I would bet that if you compared apples to apples then and now, you'd find that the difference between the amount that the top newspaper cartoonists make for the syndication of their strip is nowhere near what top cartoonists were making in the past. That trickles down to all levels, with the lower artists in the worst position- falling over the line into not being able to make a living at cartooning at all. When you cut off the entry level for young and aspiring cartoonists, it effectively eliminates the next generation.

See ya
Steve

 
At 6:12 PM, Blogger Josh "Just What the Doctor Ordered" Heisie said...

This is a disturbingly apocalyptic article. And the sad part is I'm sure every word of it is true. I just hope it's reversible.

It's obvious just from clicking around blogs that there ARE a lot of talented people out there. It's not like there's noone out there to keep cartooning alive! And more are up and coming every day!

Josh Heisie

 
At 8:36 AM, Blogger Raff said...

>> There are animated cartoons today that are neither animated, nor cartoons. <<

Tell Ralph I'll do something. It'll take a long time, it might or might not meet your expectations, but I'm slowly but surely working on getting better so I can ultimately come up with something impressive.

 
At 12:47 PM, Blogger Weirdo said...

"I think it's important to get well-done kids comics out there. Hook 'em while they're young!"

You hit the nail right on the head. Before we even think about distribution, let's start on quality. The newspaper comics are cheap, but a lot of them are horribly drawn. Lets' make sure there are quality comics for everybody to read.

 
At 12:50 PM, Blogger Raff said...

On another subject, looks like Burne Hogarth drew that Tarzan comic! Am I the only one who has trouble making a connection between his nice work on Tarzan and his godawful drawing books?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home