Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Biography: John K Interviews Bill, Joe and Friz Part Two
This post is just the tip of the iceberg... see reason number 8 on our The Top Ten Reasons To Support The A-HAA for links to more great info on the careers of great animators.
This is a continuation of an interview by John Kricfalusi with Bill Hanna, Joe Barbera and Friz Freleng. If you missed it, please see Part One of John K Interviews Bill, Joe & Friz
FRIZ & BILL AT HARMAN-ISING
Noe Gold: You gentlemen worked together at one point, didn't you?

Friz F: And that was the beginning...
Bill H: The very beginning... Leon Schlesinger engaged them as a company to produce cartoons for them. After about two or three years, he decided to produce them himself, and that is when Friz and I parted company. I stayed with Hugh and Rudy, and Friz went to work with Leon.


Click on the image to view a Quicktime Movie
of an early Harman Ising cartoon.
Friz F: I knew I had to make a choice. It was either MGM or Leon Schlesinger. But they started making pictures with Jack King and Tom Palmer, and when I saw what what they made, I threw up. I figured it would be a cinch to make pictures better than that. Leon Schlesinger said I could have my own crew. Warners loved what we were making- Bosko in "Sinkin' in the Bathtub" and all that. And when they got Tom Palmer and Jack King's pictures, they refused them. They wouldn't accept them.
Bill H: You know, I don't remember Tom Palmer.
Friz F: Worked for Disney... Jack King too.
Joe B: He came from Disney- screwed up.
Friz F: Anyhow, so I took the two pictures that Palmer had made. Everything was so slowww. He thought that made for good animation. So I took the two pictures and made one out of them, and added some new stuff of course. Warners accepted it and said, "Gee!" Schlesinger fired Tom Palmer right away.
Bill H: That would be interesting to see. Two of them became one? Only Friz could do that!
Joe B: You mentioned the problems the Disney guys, King and Palmer had turning out pictures...
Friz F: Well, they weren't Directors at Disney.

Friz F: (To Bill) But you and Rudy went on to make some pretty good pictures. In color and all that...
Bill H: That was for MGM. But they were so slow in delivering, they cut Hugh and Rudy off and started their own corporation in 1937.

But going back to the early days of Harman-Ising... They had just one writer there- that English fellow- Bob Edmonds. He was the only writer per se that I can remember. (To Friz) You were doing your own stuff... I used to sit with Rudy 'til midnight damn near every night working on stories. Back then, I was running the inking and painting department during the day. Rudy would get to work at noon and stay 'til midnight. So nights, I would work with Rudy on stories.
John K: When you were writing for Harman & Ising, were you using storyboards?
Bill H: No, I didn't use storyboards. We just had little thumbnail sketches.
John K: Did you draw? I've seen you draw before.
Bill H: I'm not a good artist. Rough sketches- yes, but they're so rough hardly anyone can tell what the hell they are.
John K: But that's how you worked out the stories?

BILL STARTS DIRECTING, AND JOE JOINS MGM
Bill H: In 1935, I think it was, I started directing pictures there- "Old Mill Pond" and "To Spring". They ran at MGM and they liked them very much. It was just about that time when they decided to drop Hugh and Rudy and start their own studio. As a result of the success of the last two or three pictures I made there, they hired me on as a director. That was in 1937.


Click on the image to view a Quicktime Movie
of Harman Ising's MGM cartoon, "To Spring".
John K: So you got hired away from Harman and Ising when Fred Quimby wanted to open his own unit in house?
Bill H: Yes, this was when MGM decided to open their own cartoon department. Well, I did one- It had a bunch of frogs and they were black people. ("Old Mill Pond" / 1936) I think that's the first thing you and I ever made together, Joe.
Joe B: No, we did "The Swing Social".


Click on the image to view a Quicktime Movie
of Harman Ising's MGM cartoon, "Old Mill Pond".
Friz F: Joe came out to California when MGM started.
Joe B: ...in 1937.
Bill H: The Katzenjammer Kids was what they were doing. Didn't we change it to The Captain and the Kids?

Friz F: Here's what happened... MGM had formed their cartoon studio with Harman and Ising...
Joe B: First, I was an animator. Then you asked me to come work with you. You don't remember that?
Friz F: Yes, I do. I was going to get to it.
Joe B: You never paid me!
I was an Animator, and I was in a room down the hall from Freleng. Somehow Friz heard I also did story. After about two weeks, he asked me if I would want to be a story man with him.
John K: Was Friz doing story himself too?
Joe B: Well, Friz was working in the style that Directors used to work in. He would settle on a story idea, then he would exchange ideas with the so-called story man. And the story man was supposed to furnish him with gags and ideas. Friz would sift it out- keep whatever he wanted, or reject it all. But it was like he said, a one man operation. The Director did it all. He was writing the story- He was editing the story- He was timing the story.
We will be posting the next installment of this important interview soon. Bookmark us and check back regularly. If you missed it, please see Part One of John K Interviews Bill, Joe & Friz
PLEASE NOTE The text and media files on the ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive Blog are not to be duplicated, redistributed or hosted on other websites without the prior written permission of the Board of Directors of ASIFA-Hollywood.

Thunderbean's Attack of the 30s Characters
It includes great cartoons in terrific prints from eight major animation studios of the 1930s. The supplemental material includes a trailer for Fleischer's "Gullivers Travels" and still frame galleries of posters and original artwork.
Stephen Worth
Director
ASIFA-Hollywood
Animation Archive






























10 Comments:
Why does every one ignore or refuse to discuss the clear racism in this cartoon. This whole cartoon has frog Cooning and recreating other stereotypes just as step and fetch it, and Sambo. It as a Billy Holiday character dancing to a "jungle rhythem. There is not enough dialog about racist images in these old cartoons. I have been reading animation blogs for awhile and everyone talks about how wonderful these old cartoons are but never about the imagery itself.
That's not Billie Holiday. It's Bessie Smith. And the other characters are caricatures of Fats Waller, Bill "Bojangles" Robinson, Louis Armstrong, Cab Calloway and Lincoln Theodore Monroe Andrew Perry (aka Stepin Fetchit). They're not non-specific stereotypes, they're celebrity caricatures... just like the ones of Clark Gable and Jack Benny in Warner Bros cartoons. These caricatures are based on the images of these great performers that appeared in popular entertainment of the day, so it isn't out of line to see them in cartoons.
There's something to be learned from films like Triumph of the Will, Olympia and Birth of a Nation. Likewise, there's plenty to learn from the MGM frog cartoons and Bosko. Hopefully, here on the Animation Archive blog, we are adult enough to be able to view these in the historical context of their time and not hold them to a social standard that didn't even exist when they were made.
Stephen Worth
Director
ASIFA-Hollywood
Animation Archive
all those stereotypes were created by the black musicians who are caricatured in the films.
They aren't racist at all.
They are historical cartoons and should be revered as documents of the times.
We should go back to the day when people weren't so easily offended.
I don't think this cartoon in particular is offensive, but I do believe it reflects the racist nature of the time in which it was made. Racism has been a part of America's culture untill the late sixties. As a reaction society may be overly political correct now, but there's no denying its herritage. This reflects most noticebly in the films of the times and maybe more so in animated films because it narrates by caricaturisation and over-stereotyping.
Think about it. What will we take away from 'South Park' in about half a century? Will we be discussing how good it was animated? Because it surely isn't! It's not even particularly cleverly produced. Even the jokes won't hold up over time. What's unique about it, is how ingeniusly it reflects today's society in a satirical manner. It will be just that: a fossile that reminds us how things were back then.
I agree that no-one would have to feel offended by this cartoon at this day, but maybe in the times when nobody seemed offended, the people that actually were would just keep their mouths shut and move to the back of the bus.
^Thank you, John! Political correctness has made everyone too goddamn sensitive, and has made everyone afraid of great cartoons from the past.
Friz rules.
Tex Avery is my favorite director from the golden-age, and I can remember all his shorts with the explosion resulting in the cartoon turning black with dookie braids. And who can forget Coal Black? I was never offended by it. Racism still exists btw, people still fear what they don't understand. If we start complaining about it here, it will defeat the purpose of ASIFA. Blacks were not alone, don't forget the germans and the japanese during the WWII. The rednecks of the South were also made fun of. And so were the upper-class, with the big pointy nose and looking up all the time. This is all about history, The golden-age era of animation. And I'm glad to be learning it.
Thanks for posting this Stephen.
I have noticed that when even contemporary cartoonists create what is essentially brilliantly funny caricatures which accentuate perceptions of exaggerated ethnic characteristics, the accusations of rascism by guilty-in-mind non-humourous white liberals and fake-outraged opportunistic hypocritical (insert ethnic group representative here) counterparts fly fast and free. The fine line between "vigilant and watchful", and soul crushing overt PC tendencies has been blurred so much in the past twenty years, it's amazing.
I think it's the intent that counts. There's always room for sound humour. It's in the nature of man to relativise social tension with humour and I'm glad we have animation as one of the media to do that in.
But there's a difference, a fine line as has been noticed. The before mentioned fun of Germans and Japanese during WW2 was of course no more than war propaganda and there are enough old cartoons out there that can be considered propaganda against specified ethnic groups. A tour Spike & Mike once did was very enlighting. Everybody of course has the freedom to use art or media to speak their minds about certain things, but it's a matter of respect how far you go. Whatever the perception of the audience may be, we all know how offensive our own intent is. Don't catch yourself propagandising, I say.
Good discussion. I'm glad this is out there.
Actually, that's not a caricature of Bessie Smith -- Its Ethel Waters.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home